“We are looking forward to partnering with both the University of Massachusetts and American International College as we welcome hockey fans to Western Massachusetts, where we have established a winning tradition.” “We are extremely excited to be hosting the NCAA Division I Men’s Regional Ice Hockey Championships in 2024,” said Sean Dolan, General Manager of the MassMutual Center.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) announced today that the MassMutual Center, in conjunction with American International College and the University of Massachusetts, has been selected to host a 2024 NCAA Division I Men’s Ice Hockey Regional, marking the first time the event has been held at the MassMutual Center.
AIC FIRSTCLASS TRIAL
This application was heard at Toronto, Ontario, on August 31, 1998, by Richard, A.C.J., of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, who delivered the following decision on September 14, 1998.MassMutual Center, UMass and AIC To Co-Host 2024 NCAA DI Men’s Ice Hockey Regional Lang Michener, Toronto, Ontario, for the defendants. Squire, for the defendants.īorden & Elliot, Toronto, Ontario, for the plaintiff Martin Sclisizzi and May Sproat, for the plaintiff ĭavid Hager and T. Rules of Court, Federal Court - see Federal Court Rules. 81 (S.C.C.), refd to.įederal Court Rules, rule 213 rule 216 rule 219. Ĭanada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Canada (Minister of National Health and Welfare) et al. Trademarks - Practice - Stay of proceedings - The plaintiff sued the defendants for passing off, trademark infringement, breach of the Competition Act and copyright infringement - The plaintiff applied for judgment based on an alleged settlement agreement between the parties - The motion was dismissed - The plaintiff appealed - The defendant sought summary judgment - The plaintiff sought an order staying the action or, alternatively, the summary judgment application, pending the disposition of its appeal - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, dismissed the plaintiff's application - The plaintiff failed to establish that the defendants would not suffer any prejudice as a result of the stay - Additionally, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the defendants' motion would result in prejudice or injustice to the plaintiff. Trademarks, Names and Designs - Topic 4410 Trials - General - Stay of proceedings - When available. The onus is on the party requesting the stay to prove that these conditions exist" - See paragraph 19. Trials - General - Stay of proceedings - When available - The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, stated that it was now well established that a stay of proceedings should not be granted unless "it can be shown that (1) the continuation of the action would cause prejudice or injustice, not merely inconvenience or additional expense, to the defendant, and (2) that the stay would not be unjust to the plaintiff. The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, dismissed the application. The plaintiff sought an order to stay the action pending the disposition of its appeal or, alternatively, an order to stay the defendant's motion for summary judgment pending the disposition of its appeal. The Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, in a decision reported 147 F.T.R. The plaintiff brought a motion for judgment based on an alleged settlement agreement between the parties. The plaintiff sued the defendants for passing off, trademark infringement, breach of the Competition Act and copyright infringement. Infinity Investment Counsel Ltd., Infinity Funds Management Inc., Richard Charlton, David Singh, Jeffrey Lipton and Grant Jung (defendants)
0 kommentar(er)
